The court ordered FDA to release the related documents at a rate of 55,000 pages every thirty days. Was the FDA trying to hide the Pfizer vaccine data from the public? Was information listed in one of the most discussed post-authorization adverse event reports concerning? Let’s find out what we have learned from this report and how the monitored adverse events compared to the reported COVID complications
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffee. :)
[ Ссылка ]
Disclaimer:
This video is Dr. Hong’s interpretation and summary of publically available scientific information
This video is not intended to serve as any advice regarding the treatment, prevention, and diagnosis of any diseases
Dr. Hong has no connections and receives no monetary compensation from any pharmaceutical companies and government.
This video is for educational purposes only.
-------------------------------
To learn more:
-------------------------------
Source References:
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency
[ Ссылка ]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
[ Ссылка ]
5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
[ Ссылка ]
Wait what? FDA wants 55 years to process FOIA request over vaccine data
[ Ссылка ]
‘Paramount importance’: Judge orders FDA to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
[ Ссылка ]
Myocarditis after Covid-19 Vaccination in a Large Health Care Organization
[ Ссылка ]
New-onset autoimmune phenomena post-COVID-19 vaccination
[ Ссылка ]
Autoimmune response found in many with COVID-19
[ Ссылка ]
New Onset of Autoimmune Diseases Following COVID-19 Diagnosis
[ Ссылка ]
Antigen Presentation of mRNA-Based and Virus-Vectored SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines
[ Ссылка ]
The tangled history of mRNA vaccines
[ Ссылка ]
