I have owned the Canon RF 100-500 F/4.5-7.1L lens for two years, and I absolutely love it. So, why did I buy the RF 100-400 F/5.6-8? It's shorter, slower, and not an L-class lens. What's it good for? Will it stay in my bag? I took both lenses out for a little bird photography to compare them. Watch and see the results!
Be sure to check my equipment list and affiliate links. If you log onto Amazon using my links and make a qualifying purchase, I get a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thanks for your support!
My kit:
Canon R5: [ Ссылка ]
Canon R6: [ Ссылка ]
Canon RF 16mm F/2.8: [ Ссылка ]
Canon RF 14-35 F/4L: [ Ссылка ]
Canon RF 24-105mm F/4L: [ Ссылка ]
Canon RF 35mm F/1.8: [ Ссылка ]
Canon RF 100mm F/2.8L Macro: [ Ссылка ]
Canon RF 100-500mm F/4.5-7.1L: [ Ссылка ]
FLM CP30-L4 II tripod
RRS BH-40 ball head: [ Ссылка ]
Induro CLT203 tripod: [ Ссылка ]
Manfrotto XPRO ball head
NiSi V5 filter holder & circular polarizer
NiSi 100mm 3-stop, 6-stop, and 10-stop ND filters
Lee 100mm 15-stop ND filter
Lee 100mm x 150mm 3-stop medium grad ND filter
GoPro Hero12: [ Ссылка ]
GoPro Media Mod
Ulanzi MT71 Vlog Handle: [ Ссылка ]
Rode VideoMicro shotgun mic: [ Ссылка ]
Rode Wireless Go II mic & receiver: [ Ссылка ]
Rode Lavalier Go mic: [ Ссылка ]
Editing software:
DaVinci Resolve Studio 18 ([ Ссылка ] hicts/davinciresolve/)
Camtasia: [ Ссылка ]
Music:
Epidemic Sound ([ Ссылка ]); YouTube Studio
Vegetable Police ([ Ссылка ])
Other Social Media:
Instagram: [ Ссылка ]
X: [ Ссылка ]
Flickr: [ Ссылка ]
Website: [ Ссылка ]
