The Millers sued Harry Craig, an attorney and escrow agent, for disbursing $5,000 of their earnest money without their permission. The trial court granted judgment in favor of Craig, but the appellate court reversed it, finding he breached his fiduciary duty as an escrow agent. Relevant facts include the incorporation of the earnest money in the purchase price of Miller's Number 7 beer and wine license, Craig's transfer of funds without the plaintiffs' consent or court authorization, and Craig's failure to fulfill his duties as an escrow agent.

Miller v. Craig (1976)
Arizona Court of Appeals
27 Ariz. App. 789, 558 P.2d 984

Learn more about this case at [ Ссылка ]

---

Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.

Check out all of our case briefs: [ Ссылка ]

Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.

Subscribe for new videos every week: [ Ссылка ]

свернуть