Stanis compares two AI models, ChatGPT and BoodleBox, designed to assist teachers.
// Subscribe: [ Ссылка ]
BoodleBox excels at three key tasks: creating detailed rubrics, providing insightful feedback on student work, and suggesting personalized lesson plans.
- Create detailed rubrics for grading, considering the specific type of assignment.
- Provide insightful feedback on student work, going beyond a simple score and offering suggestions for improvement.
- Craft personalized lesson plans to address a student's specific weaknesses identified in their work.
However, the video also highlights one limitation:
- BoodleBox cannot take initiative on its own. It requires educators to provide clear instructions and context to be most effective.
Learn more at: [ Ссылка ]
// From the video:
Cornell Univerisity - [ Ссылка ]=_
University of Virginia - [ Ссылка ]=_
All resources - [ Ссылка ]=_
// Connect with us on every social ever
Linkedin - [ Ссылка ]
Twitter - [ Ссылка ]
Instagram - [ Ссылка ]
TikTok - [ Ссылка ]
🤔 Free Higher Education AI Accelerator - [ Ссылка ]=_
----------------------------------------------
// Table of Contents
00:00 Introduction
00:20 Why BoodleBox is better than ChatGPT?
00:32 BoodleBox explanaitions
00:48 BoodleBox's Role Bots
01:15 BoodleBox vs ChatGPT (Rubric)
01:30 Comparing the results of Essay Review
02:01 BoodleBox Essay Review
02:20 BoodleBox vs ChatGPT (Writing Feedback for Student)
02:31 ChatGPT's feedback
02:45 BoodleBox's feedback
03:05 BoodleBox vs ChatGPT (1on1 lesson)
03:21 ChatGPT lesson plan
03:33 BoodleBox lesson plan
04:05 Why BoodleBox for Higher Education?
05:20 What BoodleBox can't do?
05:40 Conclusion
----------------------------------------------
#genai #cornelluniversity #highereducation
Disclaimer: No links are affiliate links only organic content with authentic people. This video is NOT sponsored by any of the brands or companies mentioned. All thoughts and opinions mentioned are our own.
To support more of this content, make sure to check out [ Ссылка ]...
