Biblical scholar Dan McClellan gives us the three minute case for why biblical scholars reject the idea that Paul wrote the Pastoral Epistles. Here I respond to these common objections and show why they're not good reasons to reject Pauline authorship.
00:00 Introduction
00:26 External evidence
05:07 Linguistic arguments
07:22 Thematic arguments
12:55 Conclusion
Dr. Boyce on the pastoral letters: [ Ссылка ]
Help support me: [ Ссылка ] or [ Ссылка ] for a one-time gift
Amazon wish list: [ Ссылка ]
Join this channel to get access to perks:
[ Ссылка ]
Visit my blog: [ Ссылка ]
No, the Pastoral Epistles Aren't Forgeries
Теги
christian apologeticstestify erik manningchristianityapologeticsdan mcclellanmaklelan tiktokdid paul write the pastoral epistles?pastoral epistles1 timothy2 timothytitusforgeries in the biblepauline authorship of the pastoral epistlesbart ehrman forgedwho wrote the bibletiktokreligionbiblenew testamentauthorship of new testamentapostle paulpaul's letterspastoral letters of paulscholarly consensus new testament
