*JOIN THE PHYSIONIC INSIDERS [PREMIUM CONTENT]*
Join the Physionic Insiders [Standard Tier]: [ Ссылка ]
Join the Physionic Insiders [Pro Tier]: [ Ссылка ]
*Standard Tier:* Access to the Premium Video Library, Full Study Analyses (+ Summaries), Insider Podcast, , Research Reviews, and More
*Pro Tier:* All benefits of the Standard Tier + Live Sessions with Me, Consulting Lite, and More
*HEALTH AUTONOMY [COURSE]*
Learn to Analyze & Apply Studies for Yourself: [ Ссылка ]
*JOIN THE COMMUNITY*
Join my Community [It’s Free!]: [ Ссылка ]
*EMAIL LIST*
One Weekly Email of Value: [ Ссылка ]
*HIRE ME FOR CONSULTING:*
Consulting: [ Ссылка ]
*DONATIONS FOR A SCIENCE BASED CAUSE*
Patreon: [ Ссылка ]
*OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA*
Instagram: [ Ссылка ]
Created with Biorender
Studies, Notes, & Amendments: [ Ссылка ]
0:00 – Introduction and Instructions
1:11 – Topics Covered
2:58 – Mechanisms of Action
15:14 – Niacin vs Statins
15:22 – Study 198
17:41 – Niacin on Cardiovascular Disease Mortality
29:48 – Study 199
31:11 – Niacin on All Cause Mortality
33:07 – Niacin on Cardiovascular Disease Mortality
34:20 – Niacin on Coronary Deaths
35:57 – Niacin on Heart Attacks
36:31 – Niacin on Revascularization
37:11 – Niacin on Stroke
37:41 – Study 200
38:50 – Niacin on Mortality
43:42 – Niacin on Heart Attack Deaths
44:07 – Niacin on Cardiovascular Disease Deaths
44:46 – Niacin on Non-Cardiovascular Deaths
45:28 – Niacin on Heart Attacks
47:09 – Niacin on Stroke
48:00 – A Fair Comparison of Niacin (vs Non-Statins)
48:55 – Study 198 Revisited
49:33 – Niacin on Coronary Heart Disease Mortality
51:55 – Niacin on Acute Coronary Syndrome
53:24 – Niacin on Stroke
54:12 – Niacin on Revascularization
55:38 – Niacin on Major Adverse Cardiac Events
55:54 – Dangers of Niacin
56:15 – Study 199 Revisited
56:20 – Niacin’s Side Effects
58:43 – Study 200 Revisited
58:54 – Niacin’s Side Effects
1:01:20 – Mid-Point Conclusions/Take Aways
#niacin #vitaminb3 #heartdiseaseawereness
********CRITIQUES, RULES, AND NOTES********
Critiques of my work are welcome! Please be aware of the following notes & rules before submitting critique:
The information provided in this study analysis is limited to the subject and outcomes detailed in the study analyzed [For example: “Consuming sugar (subject) raises insulin (outcome).”] and is not meant to be an all-encompassing education on every health outcome of the subject (unless otherwise stated). I welcome all respectful critique of the study as I may have missed a key detail that you may catch; if that is the case, I will make an ‘Amendment’ to the video and credit you (thank you for making science knowledge better!). Also be aware that I receive hundreds of YouTube comments per day, so the only way your critique can be considered is if you follow the steps outlined below. Finally, YouTube auto-deletes links, so I do not see most comments with links attached.
RULES:
If your comment is rude, you will be banned without warning.
If your comment is not about the studies/topics at hand (i.e. extending to other outcomes not discussed) or offers critique with no scientific basis, your comment will be ignored.
If you can follow these rules, I will try to address your critique and if there is merit, I will add an AMENDMENT to the content in question and pin it so everyone can see it.
Please use the following link to submit your critique: [ Ссылка ]
Disclaimer: None of the information provided by this brand is a replacement for your physician's advice. This brand is information for the sake of knowledge and the options of choice it provides, not in any way a personalized prescription. Please consult your physician before making any health related changes.
