With Darren Waller's retirement, the New York Giants have gained $11.6 million in cap savings this season. This newfound cap space raises the question: should the Giants consider signing veteran cornerback Stephon Gilmore?
Gilmore, who turns 34 in September, had a solid season with the Dallas Cowboys last year. Despite his age, he demonstrated he can still perform at a high level. Last season, he carried a $10.9 million cap number, having previously signed a two-year, $23 million deal with the Colts in 2022. While Gilmore has indicated he has had options to join other teams, he hasn't found a deal that meets his financial expectations yet.
Several factors need to be considered:
1. Talent at 34 Years Old: While Gilmore has proven he can still play effectively, there's no guarantee that he will maintain that level of performance as he gets older. Age can catch up quickly, especially in a position as demanding as cornerback.
2. Upgrade Over Current Options: Gilmore would likely be an upgrade over Cordale Flott and Nick McCloud. His experience and skill could provide immediate benefits to the secondary, offering a stabilizing presence.
3. Impact on Young Players' Development: Signing Gilmore could potentially hinder the development of younger players like Flott and McCloud. The Giants need to weigh the benefits of having a seasoned veteran against the opportunity cost of stunting their young players' growth.
4. Insurance for Deonte Banks: Adding Gilmore could serve as insurance if Deonte Banks struggles to establish himself as the CB1. Having a veteran presence could ease the transition for Banks and provide depth at the position.
With the additional cap space, the Giants have the flexibility to make a move for Gilmore if they believe he can make a significant impact. However, they must carefully consider the balance between immediate benefits and long-term player development. Gilmore’s experience could be invaluable, especially if the Giants aim to bolster their defense and make a push for the playoffs this season. The decision will ultimately come down to how the Giants prioritize short-term performance versus long-term growth.
